In other words, any EV charged in Germany will present indirect emissions, even if they are very low. That should get even worse after the government decided to shut down the last nuclear power plants the country had. After all, approximately 80% of Germany's energy mix comes from fossil fuels: 40% from oil, 10% from coal, and 30% from gas. I did not ask them if they would argue about indirect emissions this time, but that would have a good chance of winning.
The German customer association will appeal the decision. Although it did not talk about burglary and acts of vandalism, it is fair to suppose a video that helps identify perpetrators would be accepted in a civil case, perhaps even a criminal one.Īlthough it is an enlightening interpretation of carbon credits, the Berlin Regional Court did not accept it.
The Federal Court of Justice ruled that footage from dashcams may be valid in some cases despite their illegal origin. If there is any consolation for Tesla customers, it is that those willing to break GDPR in public spaces in Germany may still use the videos in lawsuits.
I asked vzbv about the scandal, and the association said it was discussing it internally when we last spoke. Former employees said they shared videos and images obtained by the vehicles, some of which "appeared to have been made when cars were parked and turned off." Although Reuters did not confirm if Sentry Mode was used, the description above fits perfectly how the feature operates. In the proceedings that led to the cease-and-desist declaration on April 6, vzbv heard that "the data obtained by the function of the Sentry Mode was allegedly not processed by Tesla." Ironically, a scandal involving how the BEV maker handled private data erupted in the US on the same day.
0 kommentar(er)
